AI Agents · Production · Reliability

AI agents in production: what actually breaks (and how to prevent it)

Published · Updated

Agent demos impress; production forgives less. Lessons from eighteen months of agents in continuous operation: real failures, guardrails that work.

An AI agent that has run every night for six months no longer resembles its demo. What keeps it alive isn't the model — it's everything around it: the queues, the fallbacks, the logs, the thresholds.

Failure #1: the provider degrades

Model APIs go down, slow down or change behavior without notice. The answer: multi-level model fallback. When the primary model degrades, the system switches to the next one without interrupting the task — our production harnesses ship with three fallback tiers.

Failure #2: the output overflows

Truncated responses, invalid JSON, context overruns: every model output must be schema-validated before use, and every task must be replayable. A persistent queue (Redis) with error recovery turns an outage into a mere delay.

Failure #3: the agent does what you said, not what you meant

The most expensive risk isn't technical: it's an agent that publishes, sends or deletes too much. Committing actions — public publication, spending, deletion — go through approval modes or confidence thresholds. Autonomy is earned in measured steps, never granted by default.

The three-logs rule

Every production agent keeps three logs: what it decided, what it executed, what it cost. Without those traces, the first incident becomes an investigation; with them, it's a five-minute read.

Working on a project where these methods apply?